Commissioner of Customs vs Eastern Sea
Trading
GR No. L-14279
October 31, 1961
This is a petition for
review of a judgement of the Court of Tax Appeals reversing the decision of
Commissioner of Customs.
Since none of the
shipments had the certificate required by Central Bank Circulars Nos. 44 and
45, the goods as imported were seized and subject to forfeiture for violating
Sec 1363 of the Revised Administrative Code.
Argument of
Eastern Sea Trading: consignee
1.
Central Bank
has no authority since shipments are in no dollar imports thus do not involve
foreign exchange.
2.
Central Bank
Circulars Nos 44 and 45 are null and void
3.
No
justification for the seizure and forfeiture of goods due to Executive Order
No. 328 (executive agreement and no governmental agency authorized to issue
import license)
Ruling of
Court of Tax Appeals:
1.
Validity of
Executive Order No. 328 is patent
Executive Agreement
|
Treaties
|
no need of concurrence
|
requires ratification
|
international agreements embodying adjustments of
detail carrying out well-established national policies and traditions
|
international agreements involving political
issues or changes of national policy
|
arrangements more or less temporary in nature
|
international arrangements of permanent character
|
2.
Unreasonable
to require Eastern Sea Trading an import license since Import Control
Commission was no longer in existence.
Lucky Club Casino Site: Play Slots at the Best Online Casino
ReplyDeleteLucky Club Casino offers the most luxurious welcome package to all new players. This casino is a perfect venue for a great luckyclub.live experience of